End to end

A fraudulent inquiry, on the chain.

Detectors flagged it. He confirmed. The furnisher answered without proof. The stolen account came off the score. A later lender pull wrote its own receipt. Every step is a ledger fact.

Before he spoke750
After suppression750
Personal-loan points+0
WalkthroughClosed

The inquiry never scored. Inquiries cannot reach ScorableFacts. The number moves because the stolen Rapid Credit Partners loan left the file.

  1. anomaly_detected · 18 Aug 2026

    Detector flags the pull

    AnomalyDetected is written. No dispute opens. The FCRA clock does not start.

  2. anomaly_detected · 18 Aug 2026

    Detector flags the pull

    AnomalyDetected is written. No dispute opens. The FCRA clock does not start.

  3. anomaly_detected · 18 Aug 2026

    Detector flags the pull

    AnomalyDetected is written. No dispute opens. The FCRA clock does not start.

  4. anomaly_detected · 18 Aug 2026

    Detector flags the pull

    AnomalyDetected is written. No dispute opens. The FCRA clock does not start.

  5. fraud_reported · 18 Aug 2026

    He reports the stolen account

    FraudReported suppresses the Rapid Credit Partners loan immediately. Waiting thirty days would leave a debt he never opened on the score.

  6. freeze_placed · 18 Aug 2026

    The file freezes

    Identity-theft protocol is file-level. A third-party pull cannot complete while this freeze is on.

  7. consumer_notified · 18 Aug 2026

    He is told the result

    FCRA §611(a)(6): a completed reinvestigation writes notice. A result without a notice cannot be produced.

  8. dispute_opened · 18 Aug 2026

    He says the inquiry is not his

    ConsumerConfirmation opens the dispute. That is when Origin's own clocks start.

  9. dispute_filed_with_furnisher · 18 Aug 2026

    Origin files with the furnisher

    The furnisher is put on notice here. Their deadline is Origin's remaining §611(a)(1) window, not a fresh thirty days. Origin's clock started at confirmation.

  10. furnisher_responded · 18 Aug 2026

    The furnisher answers without proof

    VerifiedWithoutDocumentation does not discharge the burden. Accuracy is enforced, not debated.

  11. dispute_resolved · 18 Aug 2026

    The dispute closes unproven

    The inquiry is suppressed. It never scored. The stolen account already came off the number.

  12. item_suppressed · 18 Aug 2026

    The item stops counting

    Suppression is a ledger fact. The row stays. Scoring and disclosure cannot see it.

  13. consumer_notified · 18 Aug 2026

    He is told the result

    FCRA §611(a)(6): a completed reinvestigation writes notice. A result without a notice cannot be produced.

  14. freeze_lifted · 18 Aug 2026

    He lifts the freeze

    A freeze is consumer-reversible. Lifting it does not restore the stolen account.

  15. consent_granted · 18 Aug 2026

    He grants Harbor Savings a look

    Purpose-locked, time-boxed. A rental grant still cannot emit a mortgage score.

  16. file_accessed · 18 Aug 2026

    The lender pull writes itself

    Disclosure and its audit record are the same transaction. A pull that is not logged cannot complete.

  17. decision_recorded · 18 Aug 2026

    The decision lands on the same chain

    Approved, denied, or priced — with the score and model the lender actually used. The look and the harm are one audit object.